tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6547653347296107692.post602603801106541767..comments2024-01-09T12:59:32.666+01:00Comments on Narrative and Ontology: נשׂא עון - bearing sinPhil Sumpterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16491514886782881340noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6547653347296107692.post-90449945076600813452023-05-12T07:18:13.040+02:002023-05-12T07:18:13.040+02:00Loved reaading this thanksLoved reaading this thanksFudge Recipeshttps://www.fudgeideas.com/fudge/chocolate_fudge_with_coconut_13262041239.shtmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6547653347296107692.post-17199769995143080392009-08-15T16:39:11.660+02:002009-08-15T16:39:11.660+02:00Bob,
lexical semantics is a really complex field....Bob,<br /><br />lexical semantics is a really complex field. I highly recommend reading the relevant chapter Sue Groom's <em>Linguistic Analysis of Biblical Hebrew</em> in order to get orientated. I've decided it's way beyond the scope of my dissertation to try and figure out by myself the basic semantics of <em>nasa'</em>. It's a fascinating area, though, that I'd like to get into one day.<br /><br />Michael,<br /><br />it's always good to hear from you. Do pop in again! Thanks for the bibliographic reference. This post is not really connected to my studies, it was just a thought on the side, so I won't be following this reference up for the time being. One day, when I have time ...Phil Sumpterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16491514886782881340noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6547653347296107692.post-38110530278828562612009-08-12T18:45:53.931+02:002009-08-12T18:45:53.931+02:00Hi Phil and Bob,
here is a interesting article on...Hi Phil and Bob,<br /><br />here is a interesting article on the semantics of nasa awon:<br /><br />B. J. Schwartz, “‘Term’ or Metaphor: Biblical nasa ‘awon/peša‘/het’,” Tarbiz, 63 (1994): 149–171<br /><br />Keep up the good blogging, Phil! Unfortunately, I have not had the time to give your postings the thoughtful reflection they deserve.<br /><br />MichaelAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6547653347296107692.post-71235697378708645892009-08-12T18:30:40.282+02:002009-08-12T18:30:40.282+02:00Numbers 14:34. For you, with you, in you? I know t...Numbers 14:34. For you, with you, in you? I know there are so many confessional stances here. How important it is that we not take someone else's word for the confessional stance. Yet how would we know anything if we did not have some sort of pointer - given the potentially dismal outlook of me-first or even me-only?<br /><br />Yes, Phil - I do believe they are borne by him in him for us and that the resurrection seals our capacity to join him in the bearing of the sins of the whole world. In my searches for confession, I have never put it quite this way before. Nor will I give you chapter and verse.<br /><br />By the way, I have four started posts on NSA and related nouns - but it's a slow job finding the data with the tools I have at my disposal. (Maybe I should dispose some of them!)Bob MacDonaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11335631079939764763noreply@blogger.com