tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6547653347296107692.post966920840114467745..comments2024-01-09T12:59:32.666+01:00Comments on Narrative and Ontology: Jonathan Sacks on "witness" and "substance"Phil Sumpterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16491514886782881340noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6547653347296107692.post-29061430004291525772009-11-30T21:42:08.720+01:002009-11-30T21:42:08.720+01:00Thanks for the link. I've linked to it in my p...Thanks for the link. I've linked to it in my post. <br /><br />Concerning the symphony, you may be right that it is more of a cacophony. I can't judge there. I'm guessing, though, that you do believe in some kind of theological unity undergirding the diversity ...Phil Sumpterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16491514886782881340noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6547653347296107692.post-91941653157187846512009-11-29T04:48:43.639+01:002009-11-29T04:48:43.639+01:00U want feedback eh? Sacks' intro is not critic...U want feedback eh? Sacks' intro is not critical by any means. It is apologetics lite. It's not his fault - there is no coherent analytical tradition for siddur studies. I'm writing books and papers on the topic - blogs posted earlier this year point the way. http://tzvee.blogspot.com/search?q=sacksTzvee Zahavyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15833902273722124103noreply@blogger.com