I recently posted the following question to the
Biblical Studies List:
What explains the growing tendency to spell the adjective Biblical with a small "b"? "Bible" is a proper noun isn't it? Only the Germans don't capitalize their adjectives.
I got the following answer:
You'll find that most publishers' instructions to authors require l.c. for all adjectives. Thus also deuteronomic rather than Deuteronomic. I think the only exceptions are adjectives derived from personal names, such as Josianic, Isaianic.
Here's my response:
This is interesting as there is no reason given here. According to English
grammar adjectives are capitalized if they refer to Proper nouns, e.g. "English," "
Bultmannian," "Jewish." The question is, is the "Bible" a proper noun? Here's
a definition of proper noun:
A proper noun has two distinctive features: 1) it will name a specific [usually a one-of-a-kind] item, and 2) it will begin with a capital letter no matter where it occurs in a sentence.
The
SBL handbook of style spells it with a capital: Bible. Not only that, it's logic on the rules of capitalization can only mean that Bible is a proper noun:
4.4.5. In general, a word or phrase used as a title of the whole or a specific part of the Bible is capitalized; the name of a genre is not capitalized. Thus any ancient and modern designation for the Bible, a book of the Bible, a division of the biblical canon (e.g., Pentateuch), or a discrete section of a biblical book (e.g., Primeval History) may be a proper noun and so capitalized.
What is the Bible (not bible) if not "a word ... used as a title of the whole"?
Here's an instructive example, again taken from
SBL:
Psalms of Ascent is the name of a discrete subsection of the book of Psalms, but psalms of ascent is a genre of psalms like royal psalms.
In Biblical studies, the term "Bible" is not used to refer to a genre but to a particular collection of books. When we say "Bible" we know what it means without having to qualify it. The only context in which it is no longer a proper noun would be where it is just a genre designation, e.g. "
The Silver Spoon is the bible of Italian cooking."
Writing "biblical" just feels ... I don't know ... disrespectful. Would you feel comfortable writing "
bultmannian"? It somehow
dissolves his identity into some larger category of phenomena.
Update: I'm delighted to see that I'm not the only one who thinks about such things. Kevi Edgecomb of
biblicalia posted a related complaint
three years ago in
biblical or Biblical? He points out the logical inconsistency of the Chicago Manuel of Style, the role model for the SBL Handbook of Style.