Given this reality, what can exegetes in the 21st century learn from Origen? I only have time to post Childs' three conclusions, taken from his unpublished paper, "Allegory and Typology within Biblical Interpretation" (presented at St Mary's College, University of St Andrews, 2000):
1) First, Origen raised the basic issue of addressing the function of Scripture for the church which is to be a living and continuous vehicle of divine revelation.
2) Origen struggled to do justice both to the particularity of the literal sense of the text and also to its fuller, spiritual role as a divine pedagogy in hearing testimony to the salvific work of Jesus Christ to the church and world.
3) Origen raised the question as to the faithful role of the interpreter in the exercise of creative response in receiving and transmitting the truth of the Sacred Scriptures to a community of faith and practice.
He adds a quote by Frances Young, who he believes refelcts Origen's concerns, when she wrights:
Without a form of allegory that at least allows for analogy, the biblical text can only be an object of archaeological interest.
(p. 3 Biblical Exegesis and the Formation of Christian Culture)
Update: Check out this fun post from Bishop Alan. I particularly like the latin ditty from Nicolas of Lyra!
4 comments:
Phil: Where might I locate a copy of this unpublished paper?
I wonder if you saw this note by Bishop Alan
You can't, but I can e-mail it to you if you write me at philsumpter at hotmail dot com.
Thanks for that link Bob! I've updated my post.
Hi Phil, interesting post, could I ask for a copy of the article? And in fact any that relate to Childs approach to the OT.
Cheeky I know, but hey!!
Post a Comment